Can Sociological Research Be Qualitative, Critical and Valid?
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Qualitative Research Is a Valid Alternative Too
Objective. To describe the main qualitative research techniques through systematic review of Spanish studies published during the previous 5 years. Design. Systematic review. Data sources. The Índice Médico Español (bibliographic database of items published in Spanish health sciences journals) was searched, and systematic searches of the journals Atención Primaria, Gaceta Sanitaria, and Revista...
متن کاملGeneralization in Qualitative Research on Behalf Of: British Sociological Association
Earlier treatments of moderatum generalization (e.g. Williams, 2000a) explicitly addressed interpretivist sociology. This article extends that earlier argument by examining some of its implications for a wider range of qualitative research methods. It first adopts an empirical approach, providing concrete illustrations from the most recent volume of Sociology of what sociologists actually do wh...
متن کاملCan Research be Taught?
The word “researcher” is loaded and often confusing. It takes years to become one and to master all of its aspects. In this paper, we investigate whether or not this process of “becoming” can be catalyzed through education. The focus will be on wireless communications, though the same principle could very well be replicated to other disciplines.
متن کاملAmniotic membrane can be a valid source for wound healing
UNLABELLED Amniotic membrane (AM) can promote proper epithelialization with suppression of excessive fibrosis by creating a supportive milieu for regeneration of chronic ulcer bed. OBJECTIVE The objective of this study is to investigate whether AM scaffold can modulate the healing of a wound by promoting tissue reconstruction rather than promoting scar tissue formation. SUBJECTS AND METHODS...
متن کاملReasoning with Qualitative Probabilities Can Be Tractable
We recently described a formalism for rea soning with if-then rules that are expressed with different levels of firmness [18]. The formalism interprets these rules as extreme conditional probability statements, specify ing orders of magnitude of disbelief, which impose const1·aints over possible rankings of worlds. It was shown that, once we compute a priority function z+ on the rules, the de...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: The Qualitative Report
سال: 1997
ISSN: 2160-3715,1052-0147
DOI: 10.46743/2160-3715/1997.2021